| Title |
Comparing five different iterative reconstruction algorithms for computed tomography in an ROC study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-014-3333-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristin Jensen, Anne Catrine T. Martinsen, Anders Tingberg, Trond Mogens Aaløkken, Erik Fosse |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 24% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 27% |
| Engineering | 14 | 16% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 14 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,143
of 4,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,748
of 229,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#9
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,155 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.