↓ Skip to main content

Appropriateness of full‐, partial‐ and no‐dispersal scenarios in climate change impact modelling

Overview of attention for article published in Diversity & Distributions, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Appropriateness of full‐, partial‐ and no‐dispersal scenarios in climate change impact modelling
Published in
Diversity & Distributions, June 2013
DOI 10.1111/ddi.12107
Authors

Brooke L. Bateman, Helen T. Murphy, April E. Reside, Karel Mokany, Jeremy VanDerWal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Brazil 4 1%
Germany 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 239 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 77 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 24%
Student > Master 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 32 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 132 48%
Environmental Science 80 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 1%
Computer Science 3 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 1%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 43 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2013.
All research outputs
#14,733,896
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Diversity & Distributions
#1,311
of 1,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,689
of 209,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diversity & Distributions
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.