| Title |
In vitro synthesis of (1→3)-β-D-glucan (callose) and cellulose by detergent extracts of membranes from cell suspension cultures of hybrid aspen
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cellulose, September 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:cell.0000046404.25406.19 |
| Authors |
Audrey Colombani, Soraya Djerbi, Laurence Bessueille, Kristina Blomqvist, Anna Ohlsson, Torkel Berglund, Tuula T. Teeri, Vincent Bulone |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Professor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#312
of 1,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,035
of 69,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.