↓ Skip to main content

Motor expertise modulates the unconscious processing of human body postures

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Motor expertise modulates the unconscious processing of human body postures
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00221-011-2788-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iris Güldenpenning, Dirk Koester, Wilfried Kunde, Matthias Weigelt, Thomas Schack

Abstract

Little is known about the cognitive background of unconscious visuomotor control of complex sports movements. Therefore, we investigated the extent to which novices and skilled high-jump athletes are able to identify visually presented body postures of the high jump unconsciously. We also asked whether or not the manner of processing differs (qualitatively or quantitatively) between these groups as a function of their motor expertise. A priming experiment with not consciously perceivable stimuli was designed to determine whether subliminal priming of movement phases (same vs. different movement phases) or temporal order (i.e. natural vs. reversed movement order) affects target processing. Participants had to decide which phase of the high jump (approach vs. flight phase) a target photograph was taken from. We found a main effect of temporal order for skilled athletes, that is, faster reaction times for prime-target pairs that reflected the natural movement order as opposed to the reversed movement order. This result indicates that temporal-order information pertaining to the domain of expertise plays a critical role in athletes' perceptual capacities. For novices, data analyses revealed an interaction between temporal order and movement phases. That is, only the reversed movement order of flight-approach pictures increased processing time. Taken together, the results suggest that the structure of cognitive movement representation modulates unconscious processing of movement pictures and points to a functional role of motor representations in visual perception.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 30%
Sports and Recreations 16 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,670,514
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#649
of 3,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,819
of 106,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.