↓ Skip to main content

Framingham‐based Tools to Calculate the Global Risk of Coronary Heart Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Framingham‐based Tools to Calculate the Global Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2003
DOI 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.30107.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stacey Sheridan, Michael Pignone, Cynthia Mulrow

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 94 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Other 8 8%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 46%
Computer Science 7 7%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,473
of 8,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,772
of 146,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.