| Title |
Bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft versus LARS artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00590-012-1073-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaoyun Pan, Hong Wen, Lide Wang, Tichi Ge |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#151
of 880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,524
of 171,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 880 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.