| Title |
Hamstring tendon autograft versus LARS artificial ligament for arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a long-term follow-up
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00402-014-2104-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xinxian Xu, Tingting Huang, Zhongtang Liu, Hong Wen, Luyou Ye, Yuezheng Hu, Huachen Yu, Xiaoyun Pan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 40% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#310
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,959
of 264,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.