| Title |
Cost effectiveness of coronary angiography and calcium scoring using CT and stress MRI for diagnosis of coronary artery disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, October 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-006-0439-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc Dewey, Bernd Hamm |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 24% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 49% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,143
of 4,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,284
of 66,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,155 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.