| Title |
Evaluation of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) as diagnostic tools of type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer in Japanese women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tumor Biology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13277-014-2738-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hiroyuki Fujiwara, Mitsuaki Suzuki, Nobuhiro Takeshima, Ken Takizawa, Eizo Kimura, Toru Nakanishi, Kyosuke Yamada, Hirokuni Takano, Hiroshi Sasaki, Koji Koyama, Kazunori Ochiai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 21% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#414
of 2,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,921
of 259,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#21
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,629 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.