↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical Compression Versus Subcutaneous Heparin Therapy in Postoperative and Posttrauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Mechanical Compression Versus Subcutaneous Heparin Therapy in Postoperative and Posttrauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00268-009-0284-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert W. Eppsteiner, Jennifer J. Shin, Jonas Johnson, Rob M. van Dam

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Brazil 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 69 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Postgraduate 9 12%
Student > Master 9 12%
Other 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,949,667
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#377
of 4,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,968
of 183,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#9
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.