↓ Skip to main content

Does N‐terminal Pro‐brain Type Natriuretic Peptide Predict Cardiac Complications After Hip Fracture Surgery?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Does N‐terminal Pro‐brain Type Natriuretic Peptide Predict Cardiac Complications After Hip Fracture Surgery?
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11999-017-5245-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroki Ushirozako, Tsuyoshi Ohishi, Tomotada Fujita, Daisuke Suzuki, Kazufumi Yamamoto, Tomohiro Banno, Hiroyuki Takase, Yukihiro Matsuyama

Abstract

Elderly patients with hip fracture are at risk for cardiac complications. N-terminal pro-brain type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has been shown to predict cardiac complications in surgical patients; however, to our knowledge, only two studies have evaluated the utility of this test in patients with hip fracture. We believe it is important to assess a more accurate cutoff value of NT-proBNP with exclusion of patients with renal failure. To assess the association between preoperative NT-proBNP and cardiac complications after hip fracture surgery. We performed 450 surgical procedures in patients with hip fractures between January 2011 and December 2014. Exclusion criteria were renal dysfunction and inadequate laboratory tests. The final study population consisted of 328 patients (mean age, 83 years; 80% women). Preoperatively, measurement of NT-proBNP level was performed. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of cardiac complications within 14 days after surgery based on a chart review. The predictive value of NT-proBNP was assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis, controlling for relevant confounding variables such as age, gender, body weight, and renal function; we also performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Postoperative cardiac complications were encountered in 7% of patients (24 of 328). The median preoperative NT-proBNP level was higher in patients with complications than in those without (1090 [interquartile range, 614-3191 pg/mL] vs 283 pg/mL [interquartile range, 137-507 pg/mL], p < 0.001). The cutoff level of NT-proBNP determined by ROC curve analysis was 600 pg/mL, with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 79%, 81%, 25%, and 98%, respectively, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.80-0.94; p < 0.001). After controlling for potentially relevant confounding variables, we found a preoperative NT-proBNP greater than 600 pg/mL was associated with an increased risk of cardiac complications (odds ratio, 13; 95% CI, 4-38; p < 0.001) compared with those with NT-proBNP less than 600 pg/mL. Preoperative NT-proBNP greater than 600 pg/mL is independently associated with postoperative cardiac complications in patients with hip fracture without renal dysfunction. NT-proBNP measurement provides additional information and is clinically useful for predicting cardiac complications during the early phase after hip fracture surgery. Future studies might develop a simple index for prediction of postoperative cardiac complication including cutoff values of NT-proBNP. Level III, diagnostic study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 53%
Unspecified 1 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 15 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#14,277,392
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,329
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,695
of 421,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#41
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.