↓ Skip to main content

Investigating task performance of probabilistic topic models: an empirical study of PLSA and LDA

Overview of attention for article published in Information Retrieval Journal, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Investigating task performance of probabilistic topic models: an empirical study of PLSA and LDA
Published in
Information Retrieval Journal, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10791-010-9141-9
Authors

Yue Lu, Qiaozhu Mei, ChengXiang Zhai

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
China 4 2%
United States 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 188 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 28%
Researcher 37 18%
Student > Master 34 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 28 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 128 61%
Engineering 11 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 1%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 33 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,427,897
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Information Retrieval Journal
#134
of 184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,353
of 97,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Information Retrieval Journal
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.