| Title |
Long-lasting benefits of botulinum toxin type B in Parkinson’s disease-related drooling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurology, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00415-009-0085-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giovanni Lagalla, Marzia Millevolte, Marianna Capecci, Leandro Provinciali, Maria Gabriella Ceravolo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 25% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 53% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,728,388
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,217
of 4,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,088
of 93,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.