↓ Skip to main content

6 versus 30 months anticoagulation for recurrent venous thrombosis in patients with high factor VIII

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Hematology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
6 versus 30 months anticoagulation for recurrent venous thrombosis in patients with high factor VIII
Published in
Annals of Hematology, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00277-008-0626-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Eischer, V. Gartner, S. Schulman, P. A. Kyrle, S. Eichinger, for the AUREC-FVIII investigators (as listed in acknowledgements)

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 17%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Hematology
#570
of 2,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,030
of 107,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Hematology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,464 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.