↓ Skip to main content

Bleomycin-Based Electrochemotherapy: Clinical Outcome from a Single Institution’s Experience with 52 Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
243 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
Bleomycin-Based Electrochemotherapy: Clinical Outcome from a Single Institution’s Experience with 52 Patients
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2009
DOI 10.1245/s10434-008-0204-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca G. Campana, Simone Mocellin, Michela Basso, Oliviero Puccetti, Gian Luca De Salvo, Vanna Chiarion-Sileni, Antonella Vecchiato, Luigi Corti, Carlo R. Rossi, Donato Nitti

Abstract

Electrochemotherapy (ECT) has emerged as a complementary treatment for superficial metastases. Fifty-two consecutive patients with different cancer histotypes, mainly melanoma and breast cancer, with disease unsuitable for conventional treatments underwent bleomycin-based ECT for cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases. Toxicity, local response, response duration, and the impact on quality of life were evaluated. A total of 608 tumor nodules were treated (mean, 12 per patient), with 27% of patients affected by nodules >3 cm in size. Treatment was tolerated well, especially under general sedation. An objective response was obtained in 50 (96%) of 52 patients 1 month after the first application. Twenty-two patients underwent a second treatment (because of partial response or the appearance of new lesions). Partial response at first ECT achieved a response consolidation at second application: 80% complete response, 20% partial response. Some patients underwent up to five treatments because of new lesions, but maintained superficial tumor control. After a mean follow-up of 9 (range, 2-21) months, only two patients experienced relapse in the treatment field. Through a nonvalidated eight-item questionnaire (assessing wound healing and bleeding, aesthetic impairment, daily activities, social relations, pain, treatment satisfaction, acceptance of retreatment), most patients reported a benefit in local disease-related complaints and in activity of daily living. In a palliative setting, ECT proved to be safe, effective in all tumors treated, and useful in preserving patients' quality of life. This benefit, although preliminary, deserves further assessment after a formal validation of the dedicated questionnaire.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 124 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 33%
Engineering 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 31 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,734,949
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,560
of 6,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,452
of 169,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.