| Title |
Improved survival of critically ill cancer patients with septic shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-003-1957-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jérôme Larché, Élie Azoulay, Fabienne Fieux, Laurent Mesnard, Delphine Moreau, Guillaume Thiery, Michaël Darmon, Jean-Roger Le Gall, Benoît Schlemmer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 17% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 23% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 59% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,859
of 5,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,173
of 50,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#14
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.