↓ Skip to main content

Ten years with biologics: to whom do data on effectiveness and safety apply?

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ten years with biologics: to whom do data on effectiveness and safety apply?
Published in
Rheumatology, November 2010
DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/keq326
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia F. Simard, Elizabeth V. Arkema, Anders Sundström, Pierre Geborek, Tore Saxne, Eva Baecklund, Lars Coster, Christina Dackhammar, Lennart Jacobsson, Nils Feltelius, Staffan Lindblad, Solbritt Rantapää-Dahlqvist, Lars Klareskog, Ronald F. van Vollenhoven, Martin Neovius, Johan Askling

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Other 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 55%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2016.
All research outputs
#5,258,827
of 24,744,050 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology
#2,184
of 6,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,173
of 92,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,744,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.