↓ Skip to main content

Umbilical cord blood acid–base and gas analysis after early versus delayed cord clamping in neonates at term

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Umbilical cord blood acid–base and gas analysis after early versus delayed cord clamping in neonates at term
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00404-010-1516-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catalina De Paco, Jesús Florido, Mari Carmen Garrido, Sonia Prados, Luis Navarrete

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#535
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,131
of 97,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.