↓ Skip to main content

A double-blind study on the effect of discontinuation of gold therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, March 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
A double-blind study on the effect of discontinuation of gold therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, March 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf02030968
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Van Der Leeden, B. A. C. Dijkmans, J. Hermans, A. Cats

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 40%
Student > Postgraduate 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 60%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 30%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2009.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#1,157
of 3,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,895
of 10,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.