↓ Skip to main content

Does Single Use of an Autologous Transfusion System in TKA Reduce the Need for Allogenic Blood?: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Does Single Use of an Autologous Transfusion System in TKA Reduce the Need for Allogenic Blood?: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2729-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johannes Cip, Mark Widemschek, Thomas Benesch, Roman Waibel, Arno Martin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 12 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2,440
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,724
of 286,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#44
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.