↓ Skip to main content

Challenges for Standardization of Clostridium difficile Typing Methods

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenges for Standardization of Clostridium difficile Typing Methods
Published in
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2013
DOI 10.1128/jcm.00143-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotte A. Huber, Niki F. Foster, Thomas V. Riley, David L. Paterson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Other 9 9%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 24 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2013.
All research outputs
#23,196,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#14,121
of 14,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,663
of 212,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#95
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.