| Title |
Internal versus external fixation for unstable distal radius fractures: an up-to-date meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Orthopaedics, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00264-011-1300-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhuang Cui, Jianhong Pan, Bin Yu, Kairui Zhang, Xiaolong Xiong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 22% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 52% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#425
of 1,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,761
of 115,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,454 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.