You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Population-based Incidence of Macular Holes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ophthalmology, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.052 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Colin A. McCannel, Jennifer L. Ensminger, Nancy N. Diehl, David N. Hodge |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 36 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2022.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmology
#1,892
of 6,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,048
of 122,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmology
#9
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.