Title |
Growth charts for Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (0–4 years of age)
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Pediatrics, September 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00431-007-0595-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
T. Antonius, J. Draaisma, E. Levtchenko, N. Knoers, W. Renier, C. van Ravenswaaij |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 17% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 26% |
Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 43% |
Psychology | 5 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2016.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,777
of 4,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,288
of 84,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.