↓ Skip to main content

Treating depression in adolescence: A review of the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, June 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Treating depression in adolescence: A review of the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral treatments
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, June 1997
DOI 10.1007/s10964-005-0002-6
Authors

Diane Marcotte

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Norway 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 42%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 65%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2015.
All research outputs
#5,559,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#633
of 1,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,422
of 29,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them