| Title |
Comparison of Framingham, PROCAM, SCORE, and Diamond Forrester to predict coronary atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12350-011-9425-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mathijs O. Versteylen, Ivo A. Joosen, Leslee J. Shaw, Jagat Narula, Leonard Hofstra |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 45% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#317
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,361
of 130,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.