| Title |
A comparison of twice-daily exenatide and biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes who were suboptimally controlled with sulfonylurea and metformin: a non-inferiority study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetologia, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00125-006-0510-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. A. Nauck, S. Duran, D. Kim, D. Johns, J. Northrup, A. Festa, R. Brodows, M. Trautmann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,919,343
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#1,791
of 5,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,323
of 173,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.