You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
As Facts and Chats Go Online, What Is Important for Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes?
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0067659 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sam Nordfeldt, Teresia Ängarne-Lindberg, Maria Nordwall, Joakim Ekberg, Carina Berterö |
Abstract |
Continued refinement of resources for patient information, education and support is needed. Considering the rapid development of new communication practices, the perspectives of young people themselves warrant more attention using a wide research focus. The purpose of this study was to understand information-seeking behaviours, Internet use and social networking online in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). This applied to their everyday life, including the context of diabetes and their experiences and need of contact with T1DM peers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 43% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
India | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 129 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
Researcher | 15 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
Other | 26 | 20% |
Unknown | 28 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 17 | 13% |
Psychology | 12 | 9% |
Computer Science | 10 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 9% |
Unknown | 37 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2013.
All research outputs
#6,209,810
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#74,407
of 193,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,901
of 196,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,576
of 4,692 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,692 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.