↓ Skip to main content

Factors Affecting the Preoperative and Postoperative Extracellular Fluid in the Arm on the Side of Breast Cancer: A Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in Lymphatic Research and Biology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors Affecting the Preoperative and Postoperative Extracellular Fluid in the Arm on the Side of Breast Cancer: A Cohort Study
Published in
Lymphatic Research and Biology, June 2013
DOI 10.1089/lrb.2013.0002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon L. Kilbreath, Kathryn M. Refshauge, Leigh C. Ward, Katrina Kastanias, Jasmine Yee, Louise A. Koelmeyer, Jane M. Beith, James R. French, Owen A. Ung, Deborah Black

Abstract

To explore what factors affect volume of extracellular fluid (ECF) in the arm on the side of surgery pre- and postoperatively and to determine the value of knowing preoperative ECF volume for diagnosis of lymphedema postoperatively. Women (N=516) with early breast cancer were assessed preoperatively and within 4 weeks postoperatively. Baseline measures included inter-arm ECF ratio, side of cancer, number of nodes involved, and other individual characteristics. Postoperative assessment included inter-limb ECF ratio and details from surgery. The postoperative ECF ratio was categorized as to whether it exceeded previously established thresholds, and the change in ECF was categorized as to whether it exceeded 0.1. Linear regression identified which factors explained the variance for preoperative ECF ratio and the change in ratio. Chi square analysis compared whether women categorized using thresholds were the same as those whose ratio increased >0.1 postoperatively. Postoperative ECF ratio was significantly higher than the preoperative ratio (p<0.001). Women whose ECF ratio exceeded previously established thresholds were not the same as those whose ratio increased >0.1 postoperatively (p<0.001). Only the side of surgery explained the preoperative ECF measure; extent of surgery and actual weight explained the change in ECF ratio. The ECF ratio preoperatively is not affected by nodal involvement. The change in ECF ratio is affected by the extent of surgery and body mass. Change from preoperative ECF ratio did identify more women at risk for lymphedema than reliance postoperatively on thresholds, supporting preoperative measures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Professor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2013.
All research outputs
#13,038,182
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Lymphatic Research and Biology
#113
of 295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,437
of 194,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lymphatic Research and Biology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.