↓ Skip to main content

Reliability and validity of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score: a validation study from Iran

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Reliability and validity of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score: a validation study from Iran
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10067-009-1344-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hossein Negahban, Masood Mazaheri, Mahyar Salavati, Soheil Mansour Sohani, Marjan Askari, Hossein Fanian, Mohamad Parnianpour

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Master 9 16%
Other 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Sports and Recreations 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2016.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#1,347
of 3,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,005
of 179,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.