| Title |
A comparison of bone scintigraphy and MRI in the early diagnosis of the occult scaphoid waist fracture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Skeletal Radiology, December 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002560050459 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. Fowler, B. Sullivan, L. A. Williams, G. McCarthy, R. Savage, A. Palmer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 30% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 65% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#482
of 1,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,473
of 109,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them