↓ Skip to main content

Comparative efficacy of behavioral and cognitive treatments of depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Therapy and Research, April 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Comparative efficacy of behavioral and cognitive treatments of depression
Published in
Cognitive Therapy and Research, April 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf01190064
Authors

Peter H. Wilson, June C. Goldin, Marie Charbonneau-Powis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Professor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 53%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2009.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#416
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,237
of 8,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them