↓ Skip to main content

Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Carbides

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Nano, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
patent
27 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3523 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1932 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Carbides
Published in
ACS Nano, February 2012
DOI 10.1021/nn204153h
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Naguib, Olha Mashtalir, Joshua Carle, Volker Presser, Jun Lu, Lars Hultman, Yury Gogotsi, Michel W. Barsoum

Abstract

Herein we report on the synthesis of two-dimensional transition metal carbides and carbonitrides by immersing select MAX phase powders in hydrofluoric acid, HF. The MAX phases represent a large (>60 members) family of ternary, layered, machinable transition metal carbides, nitrides, and carbonitrides. Herein we present evidence for the exfoliation of the following MAX phases: Ti(2)AlC, Ta(4)AlC(3), (Ti(0.5),Nb(0.5))(2)AlC, (V(0.5),Cr(0.5))(3)AlC(2), and Ti(3)AlCN by the simple immersion of their powders, at room temperature, in HF of varying concentrations for times varying between 10 and 72 h followed by sonication. The removal of the "A" group layer from the MAX phases results in 2-D layers that we are labeling MXenes to denote the loss of the A element and emphasize their structural similarities with graphene. The sheet resistances of the MXenes were found to be comparable to multilayer graphene. Contact angle measurements with water on pressed MXene surfaces showed hydrophilic behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,932 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 1914 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 410 21%
Student > Master 241 12%
Researcher 204 11%
Student > Bachelor 107 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 98 5%
Other 236 12%
Unknown 636 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 402 21%
Chemistry 263 14%
Engineering 170 9%
Physics and Astronomy 140 7%
Chemical Engineering 79 4%
Other 145 8%
Unknown 733 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,384,251
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from ACS Nano
#1,327
of 15,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,227
of 259,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Nano
#9
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.