You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Coordinating Domestic Legislation and International Agreements to Conserve Migratory Species: A Case Study from Australia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Letters, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.1111/conl.12345 |
Authors |
Claire A. Runge, Eduardo Gallo‐Cajiao, Mark J. Carey, Stephen T. Garnett, Richard A. Fuller, Phillipa C. McCormack |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 4 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 16% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 84% |
Scientists | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 39 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
Researcher | 7 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 17% |
Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 39% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 24% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#729,771
of 25,497,142 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#255
of 1,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,157
of 324,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,497,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.