↓ Skip to main content

Congenital malformations—A retrospective study of 10,000 cases

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Pediatrics, March 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Congenital malformations—A retrospective study of 10,000 cases
Published in
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, March 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf02751129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manorama Verma, J. Chhatwal, Daljit Singh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 18%
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#284
of 1,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,031
of 17,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,545 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.