↓ Skip to main content

Effects of caffeine on fractional flow reserve values measured using intravenous adenosine triphosphate

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Effects of caffeine on fractional flow reserve values measured using intravenous adenosine triphosphate
Published in
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12928-017-0456-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masafumi Nakayama, Taishiro Chikamori, Takashi Uchiyama, Yo Kimura, Nobuhiro Hijikata, Ryosuke Ito, Mikio Yuhara, Hideaki Sato, Yuichi Kobori, Akira Yamashina

Abstract

We investigated the effects of caffeine intake on fractional flow reserve (FFR) values measured using intravenous adenosine triphosphate (ATP) before cardiac catheterization. Caffeine is a competitive antagonist for adenosine receptors; however, it is unclear whether this antagonism affects FFR values. Patients were evenly randomized into 2 groups preceding the FFR study. In the caffeine group (n = 15), participants were given coffee containing 222 mg of caffeine 2 h before the catheterization. In the non-caffeine group (n = 15), participants were instructed not to take any caffeine-containing drinks or foods for at least 12 h before the catheterization. FFR was performed in patients with more than intermediate coronary stenosis using the intravenous infusion of ATP at 140 μg/kg/min (normal dose) and 170 μg/kg/min (high dose), and the intracoronary infusion of papaverine. FFR was followed for 30 s after maximal hyperemia. In the non-caffeine group, the FFR values measured with ATP infusion were not significantly different from those measured with papaverine infusion. However, in the caffeine group, the FFR values were significantly higher after ATP infusion than after papaverine infusion (P = 0.002 and P = 0.007, at normal and high dose ATP vs. papaverine, respectively). FFR values with ATP infusion were significantly increased 30 s after maximal hyperemia (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001 for normal and high dose ATP, respectively). The stability of the FFR values using papaverine showed no significant difference between the 2 groups. Caffeine intake before the FFR study affected FFR values and their stability. These effects could not be reversed by an increased ATP dose.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 23%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2017.
All research outputs
#18,525,776
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
#76
of 130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,984
of 418,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them