↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Postural Stability Entropy Analyses to Differentiate Fallers and Non-fallers

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Comparing Postural Stability Entropy Analyses to Differentiate Fallers and Non-fallers
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10439-015-1479-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter C. Fino, Ahmad R. Mojdehi, Khaled Adjerid, Mohammad Habibi, Thurmon E. Lockhart, Shane D. Ross

Abstract

The health and financial cost of falls has spurred research to differentiate the characteristics of fallers and non-fallers. Postural stability has received much of the attention with recent studies exploring various measures of entropy. This study compared the discriminatory ability of several entropy methods at differentiating two paradigms in the center-of-pressure of elderly individuals: (1) eyes open (EO) vs. eyes closed (EC) and (2) fallers (F) vs. non-fallers (NF). Methods were compared using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic curves developed from logistic regression models. Overall, multiscale entropy (MSE) and composite multiscale entropy (CompMSE) performed the best with AUCs of 0.71 for EO/EC and 0.77 for F/NF. When methods were combined together to maximize the AUC, the entropy classifier had an AUC of for 0.91 the F/NF comparison. These results suggest researchers and clinicians attempting to create clinical tests to identify fallers should consider a combination of every entropy method when creating a classifying test. Additionally, MSE and CompMSE classifiers using polar coordinate data outperformed rectangular coordinate data, encouraging more research into the most appropriate time series for postural stability entropy analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 112 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 21 19%
Neuroscience 14 12%
Sports and Recreations 13 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 32 28%