↓ Skip to main content

Communication Patterns in the Perioperative Environment During Epic Electronic Health Record System Implementation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Communication Patterns in the Perioperative Environment During Epic Electronic Health Record System Implementation
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10916-016-0674-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tynan H. Friend, Samantha J. Jennings, Wilton C. Levine

Abstract

In April 2016, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) went live with the Epic electronic health records (EHR) system, replacing a variety of EHRs that previously existed in different departments throughout the hospital. At the time of implementation, the Vocera® Badge Communication System, a wireless hands-free communication device distributed to perioperative team members, had increased perioperative communication flow and efficiency. As a quality improvement effort to better understand communication patterns during an EHR go-live, we monitored our Vocera call volume and user volume before, during and after our go-live. We noticed that call volume and user volume significantly increased during our immediate go-live period and quickly returned to baseline levels. We also noticed that call volume increased during periods of unplanned EHR downtime long after our immediate go-live period. When planning the implementation of a new EHR, leadership must plan for and support this critical communication need at the time of the go-live and must also be aware of these needs during unplanned downtime.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 15%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 7 15%
Computer Science 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 16 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2017.
All research outputs
#18,525,776
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#816
of 1,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,811
of 421,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.