↓ Skip to main content

Molecular and Pharmacological Determinants of the Therapeutic Response to Artemether-Lumefantrine in Multidrug-Resistant Plasmodium falciparum Malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
253 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular and Pharmacological Determinants of the Therapeutic Response to Artemether-Lumefantrine in Multidrug-Resistant Plasmodium falciparum Malaria
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, April 2006
DOI 10.1086/503423
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ric N. Price, Anne-Catrin Uhlemann, Michele van Vugt, Al Brockman, Robert Hutagalung, Shalini Nair, Denae Nash, Pratap Singhasivanon, Tim J. C. Anderson, Sanjeev Krishna, Nicholas J. White, François Nosten

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
Mali 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 191 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 18%
Student > Master 33 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Other 14 7%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 33 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 4%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 41 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#9,756
of 16,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,023
of 84,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#57
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.