↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): an implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and…

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): an implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and complications, and of procedure-specific re-operations
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00404-013-2921-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Wallwiener, Florin-Andrei Taran, Ralf Rothmund, Adam Kasperkowiak, Gabriel Auwärter, Antje Ganz, Bernhard Kraemer, Harald Abele, Birgitt Schönfisch, Keith B. Isaacson, Sara Yvonne Brucker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 53%
Engineering 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2013.
All research outputs
#21,164,509
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#1,537
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,675
of 198,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#30
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.