↓ Skip to main content

Development of Probiotic Tablets Using Microparticles: Viability Studies and Stability Studies

Overview of attention for article published in AAPS PharmSciTech, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Development of Probiotic Tablets Using Microparticles: Viability Studies and Stability Studies
Published in
AAPS PharmSciTech, December 2012
DOI 10.1208/s12249-012-9898-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. P. Sousa e Silva, Sérgio C. Sousa, Paulo Costa, Emília Cerdeira, Maria H. Amaral, José Sousa Lobo, Ana M. Gomes, Maria M. Pintado, Dina Rodrigues, Teresa Rocha-Santos, Ana C. Freitas

Abstract

Alternative vectors to deliver viable cells of probiotics, to those conferring limited resistance to gastrointestinal conditions, still need to be sought. Therefore the main goal of the study was to develop tablets able to protect entrapped probiotic bacteria from gastric acidity, thus providing an easily manufacturing scale-up dosage form to deliver probiotics to the vicinity of the human colon. Whey protein concentrate microparticles with Lactobacillus paracasei L26 were produced by spray-drying and incorporated in tablets with cellulose acetate phthalate and sodium croscarmellose. The viability of L. paracasei L.26 throughout tableting as well as its gastric resistance and release from the tablets were evaluated. Storage stability of L. paracasei L26 tablets was also performed by evaluation of viable cells throughout 60 days at 23°C and 33% relative humidity. A decrease of approximately one logarithmic cycle was observed after the acid stage and the release of L. paracasei L26 from the tablets occurred only after 4 h in the conditions tested. Microencapsulated L. paracasei L26 in tablets revealed some susceptibility to the storage conditions tested since the number of viable cells decreased 2 log cycles after 60 days of storage. However, the viability of L. paracasei L26 after 45 days of storage did not reveal significant susceptibility upon exposure to simulated gastrointestinal conditions. The developed probiotic tablets revealed to be potential vectors for delivering viable cells of L. paracasei L26 and probably other probiotics to persons/patients who might benefit from probiotic therapy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 14%
Engineering 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 31 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,195,024
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#1,329
of 1,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,292
of 278,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#20
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,466 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.