↓ Skip to main content

Phase II TPDCV protocol for pediatric low-grade hypothalamic/chiasmatic gliomas: 15-year update

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Phase II TPDCV protocol for pediatric low-grade hypothalamic/chiasmatic gliomas: 15-year update
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11060-010-0151-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kavita K. Mishra, Sarah Squire, Kathleen Lamborn, Anuradha Banerjee, Nalin Gupta, William M. Wara, Michael D. Prados, Mitchel S. Berger, Daphne A. Haas-Kogan

Abstract

To report long-term results for children with low-grade hypothalamic/chiasmatic gliomas treated on a phase II chemotherapy protocol. Between 1984 and 1992, 33 children with hypothalamic/chiasmatic LGGs received TPDCV chemotherapy on a phase II prospective trial. Median age was 3.0 years (range 0.3-16.2). Twelve patients (36%) underwent STRs, 14 (42%) biopsy only, and seven (21%) no surgery. Twenty patients (61%) had pathologic JPAs, nine (27%) grade II gliomas, and four (12%) no surgical sampling. Median f/u for surviving patients was 15.2 years (range 5.3-20.7); 20 of the 23 surviving patients had 14 or more years of follow-up. Fifteen-year PFS and OS were 23.4 and 71.2%, respectively. Twenty-five patients progressed, of whom 13 are NED, two are AWD, and 10 have died. All children who died were diagnosed and first treated at age three or younger. Age at diagnosis was significantly associated with relapse and survival (P = 0.004 for PFS and P = 0.037 for OS). No PFS or OS benefit was seen with STR versus biopsy/no sampling (P = 0.58 for PFS, P = 0.59 for OS). For patients with JPAs and WHO grade II tumors, the 15-year PFS was 18.8 and 22.2% (P = 0.95) and 15-year OS was 73.7 and 55.6% (P = 0.17), respectively. Upfront TPDCV for children with hypothalamic/chiasmatic LGGs resulted in 15-year OS of 71.2% and 15-year PFS of 23.4%. No survival benefit is demonstrated for greater extent of resection. Age is a significant prognostic factor for progression and survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
India 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 36 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Other 4 10%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 62%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2013.
All research outputs
#14,754,618
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,875
of 2,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,670
of 93,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,959 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.