↓ Skip to main content

Reading and solving arithmetic problems improves cognitive functions of normal aged people: a randomized controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in GeroScience, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 1,642)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
32 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
3 X users
video
6 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Reading and solving arithmetic problems improves cognitive functions of normal aged people: a randomized controlled study
Published in
GeroScience, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11357-007-9044-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinya Uchida, Ryuta Kawashima

Abstract

The relationship between mental exercise and mental aging is a controversial issue. People generally believe the so-called mental-exercise hypothesis, that is, the age-related decline in cognitive function is less pronounced for people who are mentally active, yet there is insufficient scientific evidence supporting this hypothesis. Previous randomized controlled trial studies showed convincing beneficial effects of cognitive training on directly targeted cognitive functions. In this study, we performed a single-blind, randomized controlled trial on cognitive intervention in 124 community-dwelling seniors (age range, 70 to 86) and estimated the beneficial effects of non-targeted cognitive functions. As for cognitive intervention, the subjects were asked to solve systematized basic problems in reading and arithmetic every day for 6 months. Neuropsychological measures were determined prior to and 6 months after the intervention (post-test) by mini-mental state examination (MMSE), frontal assessment battery at bed side (FAB), and digit-symbol substitution test (DST) of WAIS-R. The FAB and DST scores showed a statistically significant (p<0.001 and p<0.01, respectively) improvement in the post-test compared with the pre-test, such improvement was maintained up to 6 months of follow-up tests in only the experimental group. The transfer effect of cognitive intervention by reading and solving arithmetic problems on non-targeted cognitive functions was demonstrated in this study. This study shows that daily mental training can improve cognitive functions in normal adults. Although general interests in brain training have been increasing in the public, evidence for its beneficial effects, particularly the positive transfer effect on non-targeted cognitive function still remains insufficient. Here, we introduce a new cognitive intervention program for normal aged people, the concept of which is derived from the knowledge of both brain science and clinical studies. We performed a carefully designed single-blind, randomized controlled study, and the results of this study showed convincing evidence that cognitive training provides the beneficial transfer effect.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 110 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 21%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Computer Science 5 4%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 32 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 286. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#125,009
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from GeroScience
#20
of 1,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241
of 170,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeroScience
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them