You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Too risky to settle: avian community structure changes in response to perceived predation risk on adults and offspring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2013.0762 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fangyuan Hua, Robert J. Fletcher, Kathryn E. Sieving, Robert M. Dorazio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 65% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Philosophy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2021.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#10,253
of 11,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,916
of 213,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#90
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.