↓ Skip to main content

Cell-based therapies for ocular inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Retinal & Eye Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cell-based therapies for ocular inflammation
Published in
Progress in Retinal & Eye Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.02.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

John V. Forrester, Raymond J. Steptoe, Izabela P. Klaska, Cristina Martin-Granados, Harminder S. Dua, Mariapia A. Degli-Esposti, Matthew E. Wikstrom

Abstract

Since the plasticity and the potential for re-programming cells has become widely accepted, there has been great interest in cell-based therapies. These are being applied to a range of diseases, not least ocular diseases, where it is assumed that there is a reduced risk of immune rejection although this may be more perceived than real. There are two broad classes of cell-based therapies: those aimed at restoring structure and function of specific tissues and cells; and those directed towards restoring immunological homeostasis by controlling the damaging effects of inflammatory disease. Stem cells of all types represent the first group and prototypically have been used with the aim of regenerating failing cells. In contrast, immune cells have been suggested as potential modulators of inflammation. However, there is functional overlap in these two applications, with some types of stem cells, such as mesenchymal stem cells, demonstrating a potent immunomodulatory effect. This review summarises recent information on cell based therapies for ocular disease, with special emphasis on ocular inflammatory disease, and explores current uses, potential and limitations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Ireland 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Engineering 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2013.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Retinal & Eye Research
#665
of 702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,589
of 211,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Retinal & Eye Research
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.