↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of non-Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection in Kédougou, Sénégal

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Evidence of non-Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection in Kédougou, Sénégal
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12936-016-1661-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel F. Daniels, Awa Bineta Deme, Jules F. Gomis, Baba Dieye, Katelyn Durfee, Julie I. Thwing, Fatou B. Fall, Mady Ba, Medoune Ndiop, Aida S. Badiane, Yaye Die Ndiaye, Dyann F. Wirth, Sarah K. Volkman, Daouda Ndiaye

Abstract

Expanded malaria control efforts in Sénégal have resulted in increased use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) to identify the primary disease-causing Plasmodium species, Plasmodium falciparum. However, the type of RDT utilized in Sénégal does not detect other malaria-causing species such as Plasmodium ovale spp., Plasmodium malariae, or Plasmodium vivax. Consequently, there is a lack of information about the frequency and types of malaria infections occurring in Sénégal. This study set out to better determine whether species other than P. falciparum were evident among patients evaluated for possible malaria infection in Kédougou, Sénégal. Real-time polymerase chain reaction speciation assays for P. vivax, P. ovale spp., and P. malariae were developed and validated by sequencing and DNA extracted from 475 Plasmodium falciparum-specific HRP2-based RDT collected between 2013 and 2014 from a facility-based sample of symptomatic patients from two health clinics in Kédougou, a hyper-endemic region in southeastern Sénégal, were analysed. Plasmodium malariae (n = 3) and P. ovale wallikeri (n = 2) were observed as co-infections with P. falciparum among patients with positive RDT results (n = 187), including one patient positive for all three species. Among 288 negative RDT samples, samples positive for P. falciparum (n = 24), P. ovale curtisi (n = 3), P. ovale wallikeri (n = 1), and P. malariae (n = 3) were identified, corresponding to a non-falciparum positivity rate of 2.5%. These findings emphasize the limitations of the RDT used for malaria diagnosis and demonstrate that non-P. falciparum malaria infections occur in Sénégal. Current RDT used for routine clinical diagnosis do not necessarily provide an accurate reflection of malaria transmission in Kédougou, Sénégal, and more sensitive and specific methods are required for diagnosis and patient care, as well as surveillance and elimination activities. These findings have implications for other malaria endemic settings where species besides P. falciparum may be transmitted and overlooked by control or elimination activities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 23%
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Other 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2017.
All research outputs
#19,454,089
of 23,925,854 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#5,238
of 5,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,556
of 427,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#100
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,925,854 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.