↓ Skip to main content

A random pore model for fluid‐solid reactions: I. Isothermal, kinetic control

Overview of attention for article published in AIChE Journal, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1015 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
396 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A random pore model for fluid‐solid reactions: I. Isothermal, kinetic control
Published in
AIChE Journal, June 2004
DOI 10.1002/aic.690260308
Authors

S. K. Bhatia, D. D. Perlmutter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 381 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 138 35%
Researcher 53 13%
Student > Master 47 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 7%
Student > Bachelor 17 4%
Other 39 10%
Unknown 74 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 152 38%
Chemical Engineering 68 17%
Chemistry 25 6%
Materials Science 13 3%
Energy 11 3%
Other 18 5%
Unknown 109 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from AIChE Journal
#416
of 2,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,773
of 54,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIChE Journal
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.