| Title |
Doomed before they are described? The need for conservation assessments of cryptic species complexes using an amblyopsid cavefish (Amblyopsidae: Typhlichthys) as a case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-013-0514-4 |
| Authors |
Matthew L. Niemiller, Gary O. Graening, Dante B. Fenolio, James C. Godwin, James R. Cooley, William D. Pearson, Benjamin M. Fitzpatrick, Thomas J. Near |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 61% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2016.
All research outputs
#6,521,817
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#971
of 2,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,859
of 213,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.