↓ Skip to main content

Timeliness of national notifiable diseases surveillance system in Korea: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Timeliness of national notifiable diseases surveillance system in Korea: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-9-93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyo-Soon Yoo, Ok Park, Hye-Kyung Park, Eun-Gyu Lee, Eun-Kyeong Jeong, Jong-Koo Lee, Sung-Il Cho

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 110 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Other 7 6%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 28 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,939
of 14,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,195
of 94,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#23
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.