↓ Skip to main content

Weeds of change: Cardamine hirsuta as a new model system for studying dissected leaf development

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Plant Research, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Weeds of change: Cardamine hirsuta as a new model system for studying dissected leaf development
Published in
Journal of Plant Research, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10265-009-0263-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Canales, Michalis Barkoulas, Carla Galinha, Miltos Tsiantis

Abstract

Cardamine hirsuta, a small crucifer closely related to the model organism Arabidopsis thaliana, offers high genetic tractability and has emerged as a powerful system for studying the genetic basis for diversification of plant form. Contrary to A. thaliana, which has simple leaves, C. hirsuta produces dissected leaves divided into individual units called leaflets. Leaflet formation requires activity of Class I KNOTTED1-like homeodomain (KNOX) proteins, which also promote function of the shoot apical meristem (SAM). In C. hirsuta, KNOX genes are expressed in the leaves whereas in A. thaliana their expression is confined to the SAM, and differences in expression arise through cis-regulatory divergence of KNOX regulation. KNOX activity in C. hirsuta leaves delays the transition from proliferative growth to differentiation thus facilitating the generation of lateral growth axes that give rise to leaflets. These axes reflect the sequential generation of cell division foci across the leaf proximodistal axis in response to auxin activity maxima, which are generated by the PINFORMED1 (PIN1) auxin efflux carriers in a process that resembles organogenesis at the SAM. Delimitation of C. hirsuta leaflets also requires the activity of CUP SHAPED COTYLEDON (CUC) genes, which direct formation of organ boundaries at the SAM. These observations show how species-specific deployment of fundamental shoot development networks may have sculpted simple versus dissected leaf forms. These studies also illustrate how extending developmental genetic studies to morphologically divergent relatives of model organisms can greatly help elucidate the mechanisms underlying the evolution of form.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 110 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 23%
Student > Master 14 12%
Professor 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 12 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2013.
All research outputs
#13,287,322
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Research
#435
of 824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,126
of 93,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 824 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.